I discovered while cleaning out the trunk of my car today a whole yellow pad filled with what must have been the beginning of an epic poem. I stood in my apartment complex's parking lot and read through it. It spoke of a tree which begins to grow in a town, steeling away the happiness and vigor of the citizens. I am not going to assult you with my poetry, only I want to make a simple observation about a shift in my focus.
In the old days, so many years ago that they have almost danced out of my ability to count them with the fingers of one hand, I used to consider myself quite a prolific poet. I am not now discounting any of those feelings or belittling the poetic inclination. However, I used to complain (or rather, I would marvel) that though I could at moment's notice fashion up bleak scenes of death, winter and starless nights, I could not even in my best attempts form any positive poetry. I became content with my poems pointing out the bleakness of a life without God.
I could conjure up emotional numbness, but not life. Death is easy to portray, life is hard. Dull eyes can be painted with bleak words, but lively eyes, the sort that sing their own song, these are almost impossible. Any attempt at description that comes close lies open to ridicule, but to capture lifelessness with lifeless words is easy.
A group of villains might easily create a picture-perfect scene of desctruction using any number of methods. Anyone can, with enough explosives and buildings, create a set of destruction rivalling Ground Zero in its perfection. It is not hard to destroy buildings.
To create, that is the real challenge. Show me a poem that pulls down our hopes and I will show you the work of anyone with a good command of the language. Show me a poem that builds something real, no matter how imperfect, and we have begun to address the problem of what poetry ought to do.
In the old days, so many years ago that they have almost danced out of my ability to count them with the fingers of one hand, I used to consider myself quite a prolific poet. I am not now discounting any of those feelings or belittling the poetic inclination. However, I used to complain (or rather, I would marvel) that though I could at moment's notice fashion up bleak scenes of death, winter and starless nights, I could not even in my best attempts form any positive poetry. I became content with my poems pointing out the bleakness of a life without God.
I could conjure up emotional numbness, but not life. Death is easy to portray, life is hard. Dull eyes can be painted with bleak words, but lively eyes, the sort that sing their own song, these are almost impossible. Any attempt at description that comes close lies open to ridicule, but to capture lifelessness with lifeless words is easy.
A group of villains might easily create a picture-perfect scene of desctruction using any number of methods. Anyone can, with enough explosives and buildings, create a set of destruction rivalling Ground Zero in its perfection. It is not hard to destroy buildings.
To create, that is the real challenge. Show me a poem that pulls down our hopes and I will show you the work of anyone with a good command of the language. Show me a poem that builds something real, no matter how imperfect, and we have begun to address the problem of what poetry ought to do.
